The question he asks, What must I do to inherit eternal life?, is a strange question on a few levels.
First of all, as David noted this morning, there is something of a paradox, a bit of irony, here. An inheritance is not something earned, but something given. And, usually, an inheritance is a given according to the family bloodline. So, how do you earn an inheritance? Well, you "earn" an inheritance by the simple fact that you are born into a family.
But, as the text was read, I noticed something I had apparently always overlooked: what the man wants to inherit is eternal life. What does it mean to inherit eternal life? Is that something that can be passed down to the next of kin? Well, I don't know anything about eternal life, but I don't think my parents can pass it along to me with they die.
At any rate, David both appreciated the question asked and noted that it wasn't really a question that people today ask all that often.
*
And, bear with me, but the whole deal about eternal life always gets under my skin a bit anyway. There are a great many folks who would be mighty disappointed if they died and found out there is no eternal life, no heaven. It's something our churches have stressed so much that people expect it, demand it even. Their entire life revolves around the idea that there is another life beyond this one, often to the detriment of this world.
Well, I would not deny that idea, but I also don't usually put much thought into it. I would not be disappointed if there is no afterlife, because eternal life is, for me, a blessed hope, not an expectation. It is something about which to rejoice, but not to demand.
When we start thinking about eternal life, it is hard not to start concentrating on it. And it is hard not to try to earn it, to think of it as a reward, to think we deserve it (or to think someone else doesn't!). On the other hand, if we can't earn it, then it's hard not to use it as an excuse or a crutch. Either way, it's hard not to use the idea as a trump card, the ultimate trump card, that we can pull out to remind ourselves (and others!) that we will be the Winners in the end.
In short, the whole idea starts to muddy our motives and questions the sincerity of our actions. And that's why I ("I, not the Lord," to quote Paul) think it best to leave eternal life to the realm of hope and get on with living and loving, here and now.
Is that wrong?
*
In other words, I think there is a good reason people today don't ask the question the rich young ruler asks.
People today are sick and tired of all this talk about heaven (and hell)...and for good reason. They've been told their whole lives that they need to do this (and not that), believe that (and not this), to get to heaven (and avoid hell). They've been threatened with hell and then offered the "get out of hell free" card.
People today look around at all the suffering in the world, at all the suffering in their lives. And they ask, What do heaven and hell have to do with this? What does eternal life have to do with suffering now?
The only world they know is the world in which they live, the world of here and now, so they are right to ask where we get off talking about some distant afterlife when there are real people in need today.
People today, I think, are more concerned with "our daily bread" than they are with eternal life.
Is that a bad thing?
No comments:
Post a Comment